Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(312)
-
▼
August
(28)
- Court reduces $10 million false advertising award ...
- Not a close shave: Gillette class action settlemen...
- Home might be a castle, but not an identity
- eBay applied to false advertising injunction
- Buyer of allegedly infringing goods lacks standing...
- Banking on unfairness: $203 million verdict agains...
- Cherry-picking wood leads to affirmed injunction
- Pink not generic but not strong for mammography su...
- Blog comments as consumer confusion evidence
- Trademark dei-lution (post title by Zach Schrag)
- Financial innovations and false advertising
- Deceptive place name not material
- The secret ingredient is sugar
- IPSC part 6
- IPSC part 5
- IPSC part 4
- IPSC part 3
- IPSC part 2
- IPSC part 1
- Webinar: mock hearing with federal judge
- No damages for Monster Energy
- Reverse passing off claim for copying wrongly surv...
- Things I saw at Brickfair
- Am I missing something?
- Adjamming
- Interview: Lesley Fair of the FTC
- Dawn of the age of the materiality survey?
- Stayed again, naturally
-
▼
August
(28)
Labels
- 1201 (18)
- 1202 (1)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (281)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (534)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (46)
- class actions (276)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (266)
- conferences (910)
- consumer protection (920)
- content moderation (2)
- contracts (99)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1635)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (156)
- dastar (189)
- defamation (200)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (56)
- dilution (256)
- disclosures (94)
- disparagement (28)
- dmca (201)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3023)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (4)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (271)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (435)
- ftc (182)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (111)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (222)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preemption (263)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (144)
- property (18)
- reading list (306)
- remedies (269)
- right of publicity (260)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (352)
- surveys (100)
- teaching (37)
- tortious interference (112)
- trade secrets (80)
- trademark (2015)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (61)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
1 comment:
The biggest surprise here is that "Geek Squad" is copyrightable. In an ideal world, the God Squad would implead the copyright owners of The Mod Squad, who would then successfully countersue Best Buy for infringement and end their use of "Geek Squad." Never happen, of course, but there should be real consequences for being abusive jerks.
Post a Comment